PloughCroft Solar Panels
  • #citytalk
  • ideas for our urban world

    This Big City

    Refurbishing Cities: Making Undesirable Urban Areas Desirable

    3
    avatar

    Posted By

    Mar 4th, 2011
    Refurbishing Cities: Making Undesirable Urban Areas Desirable

    London’s social housing provisions are far from ideal. A lack of availability has turned many of the city’s poorly designed provisions into ghettos for the socially underprivileged, and many years of underinvestment has further reduced habitability. However, in east London attempts are being made to ‘refurbish’ some predominantly social-housing areas by building new and ‘desirable’ buildings on the edge of currently less-than-desirable buildings.

    Swedenborg Gardens, in the London borough of Tower Hamlets, is a large estate which has fallen into a poor condition. Developments are a mixture of relatively low-rise, at around 5 storeys, to very high rise. In an attempt to improve the area, formerly open spaces between the buildings are being built on, introducing buildings of a much higher standard to the area. At present, only one new addition is nearing completion, shown in the above image. Clearly of a higher standard than that which surrounds it, it is hoped that these new higher-spec developments will have positive spin-off effects on neighbouring buildings.

    Four similar developments are currently underway in the estate, at varying stages of completion. Whilst the work is reducing the amount of open space nearby, the location of the estate within a public park reduces the negative effects of this.

    Some low-rise development have also been attached to the estate, with one three-storey building (above) and two two-storey buildings (below) already complete and inhabited.

    London must improve its social housing provisions, and developments like these are an acceptable way to begin. Improving the design of the built environment can only be a good thing for those who exist within it, however, simply attaching new buildings onto old and poorly-maintained buildings alone cannot be enough. The buildings which have fallen into a poor condition will also have to be improved, otherwise those living within them may end up feeling even more isolated.


    • Alex URBACT

      In the current context of crisis, cities have the duty to strengthen the position of their most vulnerable citizens, especially concerning housing. Securing and building inclusive housing turns out as a priority for all European cities, in order to facilitate integration of all inhabitants.

      URBACT ( http://urbact.eu/) is a European exchange and learning programme promoting sustainable urban development.

      The URBACT Project SUITE, « The Housing Project » focuses on social and urban inclusion through housing. Nine cities from seven countries (Krakow, Newcastle, Rennes, Tallinn, Nantes, Iasi, Santiago de Compostela, Hamburg and Medway) work together to find ways to provide sustainable and affordable housing supply and to guarantee social cohesion through social mix and sustainable housing.

      The project activity is based on a broad involvement of different local actors, using open methods of cooperation/participation and a substantial responsiveness for needs of different social groups.

      For instance unemployment is one of the top challenges of SUITE . Concerted actions in terms of place of employment and place of residence are of paramount importance when dealing with the high concentration of unemployment in housing quarters.

      For more information, please refer to:

      - SUITE project : http://urbact.eu/en/projects/quality-sustainable-living/suite/our-project/

      - 2010 URBACT Conference : http://urbact.eu/en/header-main/news-and-events/view-one/urbact-events/?entryId=4858

    • petitsfilous.co.uk

      well, typical uninspiring, mundane, rubbish british housing architecture i’m afraid. have those architects ever been to berlin or amsterdam ? check the beauty of dutch housing in those few examples:

      http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/33838021.jpg
      http://farm1.static.flickr.com/105/293817926_75869a9c95_b.jpg
      http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/5191/img9353tu1.jpg
      http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1409/543684323_ef6f51bf23_b.jpg
      http://farm1.static.flickr.com/86/254945850_1009ba30eb_b.jpg
      http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1399/1450402515_726a8052b5_b.jpg

      it’s like totally different planet.

    • http://twitter.com/john_goes_boom John Inglis

      I live near this development and have watched it’s progress with interest. It might not be the most innovative scheme visually, but I think there’s more to it than a simple beauty contest. 
      The new buildings provide actively improve the lot of their neighbours by including new communal stairs and occupying spaces that were previously unkempt and under-used. The practice of infilling an estate without needing to temporarily rehouse the existing tenants also shows a degree of ambition, which should be applauded.Most importantly, the scheme provides new homes right next to public transport connections and community facilities like the schools, doctors’ practices and sports facilities. Given the current debates about planning and green field development, I’m glad to see a good news story about a brownfield, inner city scheme going ahead.

    http://thisbigcity.net/wp-content/themes/inkdrop